Computer checks for criminal information at motor vehicle checkpoints are allowed minimal intrusion, even if stop duration is extended.

Computer checks for criminal information at motor vehicle checkpoints are allowed minimal intrusion, even if stop duration is extended.

• A. False
• B. Not mentioned
• C. Only at federal checkpoints
• D. True

Answer: (D)

The key idea is that a motor vehicle checkpoint can include quick, routine checks of information against criminal databases without becoming an unconstitutional, highly intrusive stop. Courts treat these checks as minimally invasive when the checkpoint has a legitimate purpose (like safety or crime control) and the stop is kept brief and uniform.

Why this is the best answer: running a computer check to see if a driver has warrants or criminal history is a routine administrative step that doesn’t require probable cause for each vehicle. If the stop stays focused on the checkpoint’s purpose and the delay is reasonable, the intrusion is considered small. Even if the stop is momentarily lengthened to complete the check, the action remains within what the Fourth Amendment permits because it is a standard, efficient procedure rather than an extended, individualized search.

Keep in mind that this remains true only when the checkpoint is properly run: the delay is proportional, the checks are uniform, and there’s no discriminatory enforcement or deviation from the checkpoint’s stated goal.